UNIX tips: Learn 10 good UNIX usage habits
Break bad UNIX usage patterns
Adopt 10 good habits that improve your UNIX® command line efficiency -- and
break away from bad usage patterns in the process. This article takes you step-by-step
through several good, but too often neglected, techniques for command-line operations.
Learn about common errors and how to overcome them, so you can learn exactly why
these UNIX habits are worth picking up.
Introduction
When you use a system often, you tend
to fall into set usage patterns. Sometimes, you do not start the habit
of doing things in the best possible way. Sometimes, you even pick up
bad practices that lead to clutter and clumsiness. One of the best ways
to correct such inadequacies is to conscientiously pick up good habits
that counteract them. This article suggests 10 UNIX command-line habits
worth picking up -- good habits that help you break many common usage
foibles and make you more productive at the command line in the process.
Each habit is described in more detail following the list of good
habits.
Adopt 10 good habits
Ten good habits to adopt are:Make directory trees in a single swipe.
Change the path; do not move the archive.
Combine your commands with control operators.
Quote variables with caution.
Use escape sequences to manage long input.
Group your commands together in a list.
Use
xargsoutside offind.Know when
grepshould do the counting -- and when it should step aside.Match certain fields in output, not just lines.
Stop piping
cats.
Make directory trees in a single swipe
Listing 1 illustrates one of the most common bad UNIX habits around: defining directory trees one at a time.
Listing 1. Example of bad habit #1: Defining directory trees individually
~ $ mkdir tmp
~ $ cd tmp
~/tmp $ mkdir a
~/tmp $ cd a
~/tmp/a $ mkdir b
~/tmp/a $ cd b
~/tmp/a/b/ $ mkdir c
~/tmp/a/b/ $ cd c
~/tmp/a/b/c $
It is so much quicker to use the
-p option to mkdir
and make all parent directories along with their
children in a single command. But even administrators who know about
this option are still caught stepping through the subdirectories as they
make them on the
command line. It is worth your time to conscientiously pick up the good
habit:Listing 2. Example of good habit #1: Defining directory trees with one command
~ $ mkdir -p tmp/a/b/c
You
can use this option to make entire complex directory trees, which are
great to use inside scripts; not just simple hierarchies. For example:
Listing 3. Another example of good habit #1: Defining complex directory trees with one command
~ $ mkdir -p project/{lib/ext,bin,src,doc/{html,info,pdf},demo/stat/a}
In the past, the only excuse to define directories individually was that your
mkdir implementation did not support this option, but this is no longer true on most systems. IBM AIX®mkdir, GNU mkdir, and others that conform to the Single UNIX Specification now have this option.
For the few systems that still lack the capability, use the
mkdirhier script, which is a wrapper for mkdir that does the same function:
~ $ mkdirhier project/{lib/ext,bin,src,doc/{html,info,pdf},demo/stat/a}
Change the path; do not move the archive
Another
bad usage pattern is moving a .tar archive file to a certain directory
because it happens to be the directory you want to extract it in. You
never need to
do this. You can unpack any .tar archive file into any directory you
like -- that is what the
-C option is for. Use the -C option when unpacking an archive file to specify the directory to unpack it in:
Listing 4. Example of good habit #2: Using option -C to unpack a .tar archive file
~ $ tar xvf -C tmp/a/b/c newarc.tar.gz
Making a habit of using
-C
is preferable to moving the archive file to where you want to unpack
it, changing to that directory, and only then extracting its contents --
especially if the archive file belongs somewhere else.Combine your commands with control operators
You probably already know that in most shells, you can combine commands on a single command line by placing a semicolon (;) between them. The semicolon is a shell control operator, and while it is useful for stringing together multiple discrete commands on a single command line, it does not work for everything. For example, suppose you use a semicolon to combine two commands in which the proper execution of the second command depends entirely upon the successful completion of the first. If the first command does not exit as you expected, the second command still runs -- and fails. Instead, use more appropriate control operators (some are described in this article). As long as your shell supports them, they are worth getting into the habit of using them.
Run a command only if another command returns a zero exit status
Use the
&& control operator to combine two commands so that the second is run only
if the first command returns a
zero exit status. In other words, if the first command runs
successfully, the second command runs. If the first command fails, the
second command does not run at all. For example:Listing 5. Example of good habit #3: Combining commands with control operators
~ $ cd tmp/a/b/c && tar xvf ~/archive.tar
In
this example, the contents of the archive are extracted into the
~/tmp/a/b/c directory unless that directory does not exist. If the
directory does not exist, the
tar command does not run, so nothing is extracted.Run a command only if another command returns a non-zero exit status
Similarly, the
||
control operator separates two commands and runs the second command
only if the first command returns a non-zero exit status. In other
words, if the first command is successful, the second command does not run. If the first command fails, the second command
does run. This operator is often used when testing for whether a given directory exists and, if not, it creates one:Listing 6. Another example of good habit #3: Combining commands with control operators
~ $ cd tmp/a/b/c || mkdir -p tmp/a/b/c
You can also combine the control operators described in this section. Each works on the last command run:
Listing 7. A combined example of good habit #3: Combining commands with control operators
~ $ cd tmp/a/b/c || mkdir -p tmp/a/b/c && tar xvf -C tmp/a/b/c ~/archive.tar
Quote variables with caution
Always be careful with
shell expansion and variable names. It is generally a good idea to
enclose variable calls in double quotation marks, unless you have a good
reason not to. Similarly, if you are directly following a variable name
with alphanumeric text, be sure also to enclose the variable name in
curly braces ({}) to
distinguish it from the surrounding text. Otherwise, the shell
interprets the trailing text as part of your variable name -- and most
likely returns a null value. Listing 8 provides examples of various
quotation and non-quotation of variables and their effects.
Listing 8. Example of good habit #4: Quoting (and not quoting) a variable
~ $ ls tmp/
a b
~ $ VAR="tmp/*"
~ $ echo $VAR
tmp/a tmp/b
~ $ echo "$VAR"
tmp/*
~ $ echo $VARa
~ $ echo "$VARa"
~ $ echo "${VAR}a"
tmp/*a
~ $ echo ${VAR}a
tmp/a
~ $
Use escape sequences to manage long input
You have probably seen code examples in which a backslash (\) continues a long line over to the next line, and you know that most shells treat what you type over successive lines joined by a backslash as one long line. However, you might not take advantage of this function on the command line as often as you can. The backslash is especially handy if your terminal does not handle multi-line wrapping properly or when your command line is smaller than usual (such as when you have a long path on the prompt). The backslash is also useful for making sense of long input lines as you type them, as in the following example:Listing 9. Example of good habit #5: Using a backslash for long input
~ $ cd tmp/a/b/c || \ > mkdir -p tmp/a/b/c && \ > tar xvf -C tmp/a/b/c ~/archive.tar
Listing 10. Alternative example of good habit #5: Using a backslash for long input
~ $ cd tmp/a/b/c \ > || \ > mkdir -p tmp/a/b/c \ > && \ > tar xvf -C tmp/a/b/c ~/archive.tar
Note: In most shells, when you press the up arrow key, the entire multi-line entry is redrawn on a single, long input line.
Group your commands together in a list
Most shells have ways to group a set of commands together in a list so that you can pass their sum-total output down a pipeline or otherwise redirect any or all of its streams to the same place. You can generally do this by running a list of commands in a subshell or by running a list of commands in the current shell.Run a list of commands in a subshell
Use parentheses to enclose a list of commands in a single group. Doing so runs the commands in a new subshell and allows you to redirect or otherwise collect the output of the whole, as in the following example:Listing 11. Example of good habit #6: Running a list of commands in a subshell
~ $ ( cd tmp/a/b/c/ || mkdir -p tmp/a/b/c && \ > VAR=$PWD; cd ~; tar xvf -C $VAR archive.tar ) \ > | mailx admin -S "Archive contents"
admin address.The use of a subshell is preferable in cases when you are redefining environment variables in your list of commands and you do not want those definitions to apply to your current shell.
Run a list of commands in the current shell
Use curly braces ({}) to enclose a list of commands to run in the current shell. Make sure you include spaces between the braces and the actual commands, or the shell might not interpret the braces correctly. Also, make sure that the final command in your list ends with a semicolon, as in the following example:
Listing 12. Another example of good habit #6: Running a list of commands in the current shell
~ $ { cp ${VAR}a . && chown -R guest.guest a && \
> tar cvf newarchive.tar a; } | mailx admin -S "New archive"
Use xargs outside of find
Use the
xargs tool as a filter for making good use of output culled from the find command. The general precept is that a find run provides a list of files that match some criteria. This list is passed on to xargs, which then runs some other useful command with that list of files as arguments, as in the following example:
Listing 13. Example of the classic use of the xargs tool
~ $ find some-file-criteria some-file-path | \
> xargs some-great-command-that-needs-filename-arguments
xargs as just a helper for find; it is one of those underutilized tools that, when
you get into the habit of using it, you want to try on everything, including the following uses.Passing a space-delimited list
In its simplest invocation,
xargs
is like a filter that takes as input a list (with each member on a
single line). The tool puts those members on a single space-delimited
line:
Listing 14. Example of output from the xargs tool
~ $ xargsabcControl-D a b c ~ $
xargs to get a list of arguments for some other tool that takes file names as an argument, as in the following example:
Listing 15. Example of using of the xargs tool
~/tmp $ ls -1 | xargs December_Report.pdf README a archive.tar mkdirhier.sh ~/tmp $ ls -1 | xargs file December_Report.pdf: PDF document, version 1.3 README: ASCII text a: directory archive.tar: POSIX tar archive mkdirhier.sh: Bourne shell script text executable ~/tmp $
xargs command is useful for more than passing file names. Use it any time you need to filter text into a single line:
Listing 16. Example of good habit #7: Using the xargs tool to filter text into a single line
~/tmp $ ls -l | xargs -rw-r--r-- 7 joe joe 12043 Jan 27 20:36 December_Report.pdf -rw-r--r-- 1 \ root root 238 Dec 03 08:19 README drwxr-xr-x 38 joe joe 354082 Nov 02 \ 16:07 a -rw-r--r-- 3 joe joe 5096 Dec 14 14:26 archive.tar -rwxr-xr-x 1 \ joe joe 3239 Sep 30 12:40 mkdirhier.sh ~/tmp $
Be cautious using xargs
xargs.
By default, the end-of-file string is an underscore (_); if that
character is sent as a single input argument, everything after it is
ignored. As a precaution against this, use the -e flag, which, without arguments, turns off the end-of-file string completely.Know when grep should do the counting -- and when it should step aside
Avoid piping a
grep to wc -l in order to count the number of lines of output. The -c option to grep gives a count of lines that match the specified pattern and is generally faster than a pipe to wc, as in the following example:Listing 17. Example of good habit #8: Counting lines with and without grep
~ $ time grep and tmp/a/longfile.txt | wc -l 2811 real 0m0.097s user 0m0.006s sys 0m0.032s
~ $ time grep -c and tmp/a/longfile.txt
2811
real 0m0.013s user 0m0.006s sys 0m0.005s ~ $
-c option is also a better way to do the counting. With multiple files, grep with the -c option returns a separate count for each file, one on each line, whereas a pipe to wc gives a total count for all files combined.However, regardless of speed considerations, this example showcases another common error to avoid. These counting methods only give counts of the number of lines containing matched patterns -- and if that is what you are looking for, that is great. But in cases where lines can have multiple instances of a particular pattern, these methods do not give you a true count of the actual number of instances matched. To count the number of instances, use
wc to count, after all. First, run a grep command with the -o option, if your version supports it. This option outputs only the matched pattern, one on each line, and not the line itself. But you cannot use it in conjunction with the -c option, so use wc -l to count the lines, as in the following example:Listing 18. Example of good habit #8: Counting pattern instances with grep
~ $ grep -o and tmp/a/longfile.txt | wc -l 3402 ~ $
wc is slightly faster than a second call to grep with a dummy pattern put in to match and count each line (such as grep -c).Match certain fields in output, not just lines
A tool like
awk is preferable to grep when you want to match the pattern in only a specific field in the lines of output and not just anywhere in the lines.The following simplified example shows how to list only those files modified in December:
Listing 19. Example of bad habit #9: Using grep to find patterns in specific fields
~/tmp $ ls -l /tmp/a/b/c | grep Dec -rw-r--r-- 7 joe joe 12043 Jan 27 20:36 December_Report.pdf -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 238 Dec 03 08:19 README -rw-r--r-- 3 joe joe 5096 Dec 14 14:26 archive.tar ~/tmp $
grep filters the lines, outputting all files with Dec
in their modification dates as well as in their names. Therefore, a
file such as December_Report.pdf is matched, even if it has not been
modified since January. This probably is not what you want. To match a
pattern in a particular field, it is better to use awk, where a relational operator matches the exact field, as in the following example:
Listing 20. Example of good habit #9: Using awk to find patterns in specific fields
~/tmp $ ls -l | awk '$6 == "Dec"' -rw-r--r-- 3 joe joe 5096 Dec 14 14:26 archive.tar -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 238 Dec 03 08:19 README ~/tmp $
Stop piping cats
A basic-but-common
grep usage error involves piping the output of cat to grep to search the contents of a single file. This is absolutely unnecessary and a waste of time, because tools such as grep take file names as arguments. You simply do not need to use cat in this situation at all, as in the following example:
Listing 21. Example of good and bad habit #10: Using grep with and without cat
~ $ time cat tmp/a/longfile.txt | grep and 2811 real 0m0.015s user 0m0.003s sys 0m0.013s ~ $ time grep and tmp/a/longfile.txt 2811 real 0m0.010s user 0m0.006s sys 0m0.004s ~ $
cat to intersperse multiple files with stdin is often not valid. It is really only necessary to concatenate first before a pipe when you use cat with one of its several filtering options.
Post a Comment